August 2004
Dear Visitor,
The beginning of August, as promised. And some news,
for a change!
Warning: if you’re not a cat person, don’t
bother reading this until much nearer the end. It
will bore you stiff.
I don’t think I would have chosen to have
a new cat just yet, but as is the way of these things,
this one just happened to us. As you may know, my
sister Una and I share this house, and she works
in the magistrates’ court in Corby. Someone
passing the police station on his way to the court
heard very loud miaows coming from the thicket between
the two buildings, and in a bush, he found a brown
tabby kitten, starving, and – we were to discover – host
to a fairly remarkable number of parasites. He picked
it up and took it to the court, where Una found herself
in charge of it. Everyone’s best guess was
that it was around four months old, and clearly hadn’t
had any food for a very long time, but its coat was
beautiful, its eyes and skin were clear, and it was
very clean, despite everything.
Una brought him home, there being not much else
she could do, since none of the cat sanctuaries had
any vacant places. She bought a litter tray and kitten
food, and he ate so frantically that we thought he
would immediately be sick, but he wasn’t. Then
he tried to eat the cat litter. Neither of us had
much intention of keeping him – apart from
anything else, we thought he must belong to someone,
as he had used the tray as soon as he needed to relieve
himself, having by that time figured out that the
litter wasn’t for eating, and he was entirely
happy to be handled. But none of our enquiries produced
a lost tabby kitten, and when we took him to have
his unwelcome visitors treated, the vet said that
in his opinion no-one had ever owned him, since no
house-cat could have come by that number of fleas,
whatever sort of house he lived in. The fact that
he used his litter tray was apparently of no significance;
according to him, cats are born house-trained.
So now he’s been de-everythinged, is currently
being brought to his fighting weight in order that
he can have his injections, and he is absolutely
beautiful – in fact, he’s so pretty that
everyone (illogically and anthropomorphically) thought
he was a girl, but he isn’t. So, what with
that, and where he was discovered, his full name
is Boy George Bush, but you can call him George.
He is a delightful kitten; entirely good-natured
and gentle, with a purr like a jet engine, and no
thought of scratching or biting, not even when he’s
playing – which I’m glad to say that
he now is. At first, when I offered him Frankie’s
old play-mouse, he didn’t know what he was
supposed to do with it. If you couldn’t eat
it, he wasn’t interested. Now, he plays with
it all the time. He began experimentally batting
about on the carpet in the living room, then picked
it up in his mouth and trotted into the kitchen with
it, where he could send it spinning much more satisfactorily
on the tiles. It’s got one eye, no ears, and
no tail, but he loves it.
We’ve had him a week now, and after that first
starving acceptance of it, he said kitten food was
for wimps, and is eating grown-up cat food. I don’t
know him very well yet, but his temperament seems
very like one of our previous cats, a big black softie
called Charlie. Charlie’s only recorded act
of violence was when he and his mother (a small black
cat called Baby) were lying in front of the fire,
sleeping. Well – Baby was sleeping; Charlie
was trying to sleep, but Baby was snoring, and Charlie’s
ears twitched and he shifted uncomfortably every
time she did. Eventually, he stood up, walked over,
hit her, then walked back and curled up again. It
worked, and he at last got some shut-eye.
Looks-wise he has big paws and long whiskers, so
I think he’s going to be a big cat, like our
last tabby, Dylan. He’s certainly growing very
fast – I think he’s twice the size he
was when he was found. We got Dylan not long after
we lost Charlie, as it happens – Charlie lived
to be eighteen, so it was very like losing Frankie;
we weren’t really in the market for another
cat so soon. But Dylan had belonged to friends of
my other sister, Patti, a couple who subsequently
split up. Neither of them was able to take Dylan
with them, and they had left him with someone who
was supposed to be looking after him, but wasn’t.
Patti rescued him, and we got him. We already knew
about Dylan, whose claim to fame was that he could
open the fridge, and sure enough, he could. If we
forgot to put the kitchen stool against the fridge
when we went to bed, it would be open in the morning,
and his tin of food would be on the floor. It was
in the days before they’d thought of these
plastic lids for opened tins, so it was only covered
with clingfilm, but despite his expertise with fridge
doors, he never did work out how to get the clingfilm
off. And he never took anything else out – just
his own food.
Sorry there’s no photograph of George, but
though I have taken some, they’re still in
the camera. I’m thinking of getting a digital
camera so I can put photographs straight on to the
web site, but I haven’t got one yet, so I still
have to wait for the film to be finished before getting
the photos developed. Next month, I hope to let you
see him.
OK, non-cat people, you can come back now!
And another bit of news. I was interviewed by the
Glasgow Herald. They have a London base, and one
of their reporters wanted to do a piece on Corby,
having done one twenty years ago when the town was
still reeling from the closure of the steelworks.
As I may have mentioned elsewhere on this site, Corby
is a Scottish town that has somehow found itself
right in the middle of England, and the Scottish
papers are always interested in it. He found this
website while trawling the Internet, and came to
see me, complete with a photographer. I don’t
know if his article will ever see the light of day – I
think he’s waiting for a news angle before
publishing it – but if it does, I’ll
let you know.
So there you are – you wait months for a newsletter
with something approaching news in it, and then two
bits of news come along at once.
Back to more mundane things. Last month’s
competition was a bit of a stinker, as it turned
out. It wasn’t deliberate – the detail
is picked by Pedalo, the people who manage the site,
and though I did work out the correct answer, I wasn’t
convinced that I had, and had to seek the official
verdict. It wasn’t, as so many of you thought,
a detail from the stained glass window of St Leonard’s,
but one from the trees in front of the police station – the
very police station outside which George was found.
Anyway – congratulations to those of you who
did spot it, especially to the five winners, who
have been notified. It remains to be seen whether
this month’s is difficult or easy, but have
a go anyway. It doesn’t cost anything, so you
might as well. Don’t forget that you can choose
to receive a copy of Shred of Evidence or the Lloyd
and Hill TV movie, if you win first prize.
What else? British Telecom are still trying to fix
the broadband without success, and have missed two
appointments in a row. I think that means I get some
more compensation. They now think they’ve traced
the fault to the telegraph pole, but apparently it’s
due for renewal anyway, so I expect that’s
complicating matters. We shall see. Watch out for
next month’s thrilling instalment…
By the time I talk to you again, I shall be a year
older, but fear not, I won’t be any wiser.
I’ve given up on that.
See you in September!
Love,
Jil
Top
of Page
|